Tag Archives: r script

Using R: Random Sample Selection and One-Way ANOVA


A tutorial by Douglas M. Wiig

In the previous tutorial we looked at the hypothesis that one’s outlook on life is influenced by the amount of education attained. Using the GSS 2014 data file we looked at the education variable ‘educ’, and the outlook on life variable ‘life’, a measure of outlook on life as ‘DULL’, ‘ROUTINE’, or ‘EXCITING.’ We selected a subset for each response category and found that there appeared to be
differences among the mean level of education measured in years for each of the categories of outlook on life. To further examine this we will first randomly select a sample from the data file, look at the
mean education for each category of outlook on life, and evaluate the means using simple one-way ANOVA.

To randomly select a sample from a population of values we can use the sample() function. There are a number of options and variations of the function that are beyond the scope of this tutorial. Since the
variable ‘educ’ is measured in years we can use the sample.int() function which is designed for use with integer values. The general format of the function is:

sample.int(n, size = n, replace = FALSE)

where: n = the size of population the sample is from
size = the size of the sample
replace = FALSE if sampling without replacement; TRUE if sampling with replacement

For this example I will select a sample of n=500 without replacement from the data file containing a total of 2538 cases. The sample data is loaded into a data matrix as it is selected. This will be
accomplished in two steps. In the first step we will load the sample.int() function with the values to use for selecting the sample and put the vector in ‘randsamp2. The code is:

randsamp2 <- sample.int(2538, size=500, replace=FALSE)

To select the sample make sure that make sure that the GSS2014 data file is loaded into the R environment. I previously loaded the data file into a data frame ‘gss14.’  To select the sample and load
it into a data frame ‘randgss2’ the code is:

randgss2 <- gss14[randsamp2,]

Once the sample has been generated we can look at the mean years of education for each of the three responses for outlook on life. We do this by selecting a subset for each response. Use the following
code:

###################################################
#look at educ means by life by selecting 3 subsets from randgss2
###################################################
life12 <- subset(randgss2, life == “DULL”, select=educ)
life22 <- subset(randgss2, life == “ROUTINE”, select=educ)
life32 <- subset(randgss2, life == “EXCITING”, select=educ)

Now run summary statistics for each subset to look at the means:

summary(life12)
summary(life22)
summary(life32)

We can now see that the means are as follows:

life12 = 13.0
life22 = 13.29
life 32 = 14.51

and we can generate a summary visual of the differences among the three subsets by doing a simple boxplot using:

###################################################
# do boxplots of the subsets to visualize differences
#boxplot using educ and life variables from the ‘randgss2’ data #frame
###################################################
boxplot(randgss2$educ ~ randgss2$life, main=”Education and View on Life n = 500″, xlab=”View of Life”,ylab=”Years of Education”)

The following graph will result:

Rplotrandgss2

As can be seen above there does appear to be a difference among these means, particularly for those who see life as ‘DULL.’ To see if these differences are significant an ANOVA will be run using the
simple one way ANOVA function aov(). The basic function is:
aov(formula, data = NULL)For our example we use:

model2 <- aov(educ ~ life, data=randgss2)

which analyzes the mean education by category of outlook on life using the randgss2 sample of n=500. The results are stored in ‘model2.’ The output from this operation is shown using the summary() function. This produces the following output:

summary(model2)

Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) life
2  171.5    85.77     10.42 4.08e-05 ***
Residuals  332     2732.2  8.23

Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
165 observations deleted due to missingness

This output shows that at least one of the means differs significantly from the others. To test this difference further we can use a pair-wise comparison of means to see which means differ significantly
from each other. There are several options available. We will use a basic Tukey HSD comparison. This is accomplished using:

##################################################
#run HSD on sample
TukeyHSD(model2)
##################################################

producing the following output:

Tukey multiple comparisons of means
95% family-wise confidence level

Fit: aov(formula = educ ~ life, data = randgss2, projections = TRUE)

$life                               diff                     lwr                upr                    p adj
ROUTINE-EXCITING -1.074404 -1.833686 -0.31512199  .0027590
DULL-EXCITING          -2.729412 -4.447386 -1.01143754  .0006325
DULL-ROUTINE           -1.655008 -3.384551 0.07453525 00640910

By looking at the p value for each comparison it can be seen that both the ROUTINE-EXCITING and DULL-EXCITING means differ significantly at p ≤ .05

I might point out that if a researcher was using the GSS 2014 data file as we used here there would need to be more data preparation prior to running any analysis. For example, there is a fair amount of
missing data as indicated by NA in the raw data file. The missing data would need to be handled in some way. R has numerous functions and packages that can assist in resolving missing data issues of
various types, but a discussion of these is a subject for a future tutorial.
8/7/15                   Douglas M. Wiig                    http://dmwiig.net

Advertisements

Tutorial: Using R to Analyze NORC GSS Social Science Data, Part Six, R and ANOVA


Tutorial: Using R to Analyze NORC GSS Social Science Data, Part Six, R and ANOVA

A tutorial by Douglas M. Wiig

As discussed in previous segments of this tutorial, for anyone interested in researching social science questions there is a wealth of survey data available through the National Opinion Research Center (NORC) and its associated research universities. The Center has been conducting a national survey each year since 1972 and has compiled a massive database of data from these surveys. Most if not all of these data files can be accessed and downloaded without charge. I have been working with the 2014 edition of the data and for all part of this tutorial will use the GSS2014 data file that is available for download on the Center’s web site. (See the NORC main website at http://www.norc.org/Research/Projects/Pages/general-social-survey.aspx and at http://www3.norc.org/GSS+Website ).

Accessing and loading the NORC GSS2014 data set was discussed in part one of this tutorial. Refer to it if you need specific information on downloading the data set in STATA or SPSS format.  In this segment we will use the subset function to select a desired set of cases from all of the cases in the data file that meet certain criteria.  As indicated in my previous tutorial the GSS2014 data set contains a
total of 2588 cases and 866 variables.

Before starting this segment of the tutorial be sure that the foreign
package is installed and loaded into your R session. As I have indicated in previous tutorials, use of an IDE such as R Studio greatly facilitates entering and debugging R code when doing research such as is discussed in my tutorials.  

Import the GSS 2014 data file in SPSS format and load it into the data frame ‘gss14’ using:
#########################################################import  GSS2014 file in SPSS .sav format
#uses foreign package
########################################################require(foreign)
gss14<- read.spss("/path to your location/GSS2014.sav",                      use.value.labels=TRUE,max.value.labels=Inf, to.data.frame=TRUE)
#################################################

In this tutorial the analysis of this sample will focus on examining the hypothesis “An individual’s outlook on life is influenced by the amount of education the person has attained.” The GSS variables ‘educ’, education in number of years and ‘life’, whether the respondent rated life DULL, ROUTINE, or EXCITING. A simple approach to testing this hypothesis is to compare mean levels of education for each of the three categories of response. I will do this analysis in two stages. In the first stage I will use techniques discussed in a previous tutorial to select a subset of each response category and display the mean education level for each of the three categories.

The three subsets life1, life2, and life3 are generated using the following code:

###################################################
# create 3 subsets from gss14 view on life by years of education
##################################################

life1 <- subset(gss14, life == “DULL”, select=educ)

life2 <- subset(gss14, life ==”ROUTINE”, select=educ)

life3 <- subset(gss14, life == “EXCITING”, select=educ)

###################################################

#The three means of the subsets are displayed using the code:

# run summary statistics for each subgroup

##################################################

summary(life1)

summary(life2)

summary(life3)

###################################################

resulting the following output:
educ
Min. : 0.00
1st Qu.:10.00
Median :12.00
Mean :11.78
3rd Qu.:13.00
Max. :20.00

summary(life2)
educ
Min. : 0.00
1st Qu.:12.00
Median :13.00
Mean :13.22
3rd Qu.:16.00
Max. :20.00
NA’s :1

summary(life3)
educ
Min. : 2.00
1st Qu.:12.00
Median :14.00
Mean :14.31
3rd Qu.:16.00
Max. :20.00

As is seen above there does appear to be a difference among mean years of education and the corresponding outlook on life. In order to examine whether or not these observed differences are not due to chance a simple one-way Analysis of Variance can be generated.

In the next tutorial I will discuss performing the ANOVA and using pair-wise comparisons to determine which if any means are different.

R Tutorial: Using R to Analyze the NORC GSS2014 Database, Selecting Subsets and Comparing Means Using Student’s t Test


R Tutorial Part Three: Selecting Subsets and Comparing Means Using an Independent Sample t Test

A tutorial by Douglas M. Wiig

As discussed in previous segments of this tutorial, for anyone interested in researching social science questions there is a wealth of survey data available through the National Opinion Research Center (NORC) and its associated research universities. The Center has been conducting a national survey each year since 1972 and has compiled a massive database of data from these surveys. Most if not all of these data files can be accessed and downloaded without charge. I have been working with the 2014 edition of the data and for all part of this tutorial will use the GSS2014 data file that is available for download on the Center’s web site. (See the NORC main website at http://www.norc.org/Research/Projects/Pages/general-social-survey.aspx and at http://www3.norc.org/GSS+Website ).

Accessing and loading the NORC GSS2014 data set was discussed in part one of this tutorial. Refer to it if you need specific information on downloading the data set in STATA or SPSS format.  In this segment we will use the subset function to select a desired set of cases from all of the cases in the data file that meet certain criteria.  As indicated in my previous tutorial the GSS2014 data set contains a total of 2588 cases and 866 variables.
Before starting this segment of the tutorial be sure that the foreign package is installed and loaded into your R session.  Import the GSS 2014 data file and load it into the data frame ‘Dataset’ using:

########################################################
#import GSS2014 file in SPSS .sav format
#uses foreign package
########################################################
require(foreign)
Dataset <- read.spss("/path to your location/GSS2014.sav", 
                     use.value.labels=TRUE, max.value.labels=Inf, to.data.frame=TRUE)

###########################################################

In the previous segment of this tutorial we started to investigate whether or not an individual’s education had an effect on their response to a NORC survey item dealing with abortion. The item asked respondents to either ‘AGREE’ or ‘DISAGREE’ with the statement ‘A women should be allowed to obtain an abortion under any circumstances.’ We selected a subset of all of the respondents who answered ‘AGREE’ and a second subset of all the respondents who answered ‘DISAGREE’ using the following code:

##############################################

#select subset from Dataset and write to data frame SS1

###################################################
SS1 <- subset(Dataset, abany == "YES", select=educ)

View(SS1)

#######################################################

######################################################
#select subset from Dataset and write to data frame SS2
######################################################
SS2 <- subset(Dataset, abany == "NO", select=educ)
View(SS2)

A mean number of years of education can be calculated for each of the subsets using the following:

#calculate descriptive statistics for SS1 and SS2

####################################################

summary(SS1)

summary(SS2)

####################################################

Output from the above for SS1 is:

> summary(SS1)

educ

Min. : 0.0

1st Qu.:12.0

Median :15.0

Mean :14.6

3rd Qu.:16.0

Max. :20.0

Output for SS2 is:

> summary(SS2)

educ

Min. : 0.00

1st Qu.:12.00

Median :12.00

Mean :12.93

3rd Qu.:15.00

Max. :20.00

NA’s :1

As seen above there is a difference in mean years of education for the two subsets. We can use a two independent sample t test to determine whether or not the difference is large enough to not be due to chance.

In this tutorial I will use the Student’s t test function t.test that is found in the stats package. The function is used in the following form:

t.test =(x,y, alternative = c(“two.sided”, “less”, “greater”), mu=0, paired = FALSE, var.equal = FALSE, conf.level = .95)

where x and y = numeric vectors of data values

alternative = specification of a one-tailed or two-tailed test

mu = 0 specification that true difference between means is zero

paired = FALSE specification of a two independent sample test; if TRUE a paired samples test will be used

var.equal = specification of equal variances of the two samples; if TRUE the pooled variance is used otherwise a Welsh approximation of degrees of freedom is used

conf.level = confidence level of the interval

For further information see the documentation in CRAN help files for the function t.test().

Using the vectors selected from the dataset SS1, and SS2 the t test is performed using:

###########################################################

#perform a t test to compare sample means

#########################################################

t.test(SS1,SS2, alternative = c(“two.sided”), mu=0, paired=FALSE, var.equal = TRUE, conf.level = .95)

###########################################################

Resulting in output of:

        Two Sample t-test

data:  SS1 and SS2 
t = 11.1356, df = 1650, p-value < 2.2e-16
alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0 
95 percent confidence interval:
 1.369673 1.955333 
sample estimates:
mean of x mean of y 
 14.59517  12.93267 

We can see that the difference between the mean years of education for the ‘YES’ and the ‘NO’ samples is significant at an alpha level of p=.05. Subsets can also be used to compare means involving more than two samples and using simple one-way Analysis of Variance. This will be covered in the next part of the tutorial.

R Tutorial: Using the NORC GSS2014 Data File, Creating and Using Subsets


R Tutorial:  Using the NORC GSS2014 data file, creating and using subsets

By Douglas M. Wiig

As discussed in the first part of this tutorial, for anyone interested in researching social science questions there is a wealth of survey data available through the National Opinion Research Center (NORC) and its associated research universities. The Center has been conducting a national survey each year since 1972 and has compiled a massive database of data from these surveys. Most if not all of these data files can be accessed and downloaded without charge. I have been working with the 2014 edition of the data and for all part of this tutorial will use the GSS2014 data file that is available for download on the Center’s web site. (See the NORC main website at http://www.norc.org/Research/Projects/Pages/general-social-survey.aspx and at http://www3.norc.org/GSS+Website ).

Accessing and loading the NORC GSS2014 data set was discussed in part one of this tutorial. Refer to it if you need specific information on downloading the data set in STATA or SPSS format.  In this segment we will  use the subset function to select a desired set of cases from all of the cases in the data file that meet certain criteria.  As indicated in my previous tutorial the GSS2014 data set contains a total of 2588 cases and 866 variables.

One of the areas surveyed by NORC each year deals with attitudes toward abortion. One of the questions simply asks respondents if they '...approve of abortion under any circumstances.'  The response is either YES or NO to this question.  Let's assume a researcher is interested in investigating whether or not education has an effect on how the respondent answers the question.

To look at this hypothesis we can use the abortion attitude variable mentioned above, 'abany', and an education variable 'educ' which measures education as the actual number of years of education.  Twelve years of education would be a high school graduate for example, and 16 years would be a college graduate.  We can select a subset of all respondents who indicated 'YES' on the survey question and then generate a mean years of education for this subset.  We can then select a subset of all respondents who indicated 'NO' on the question and calculate a mean years of education for the second subset.

Before starting this code segment be sure that the foreign package is installed and loaded into your R session.  Import the GSS 2014 data file and load it into the data frame ‘Dataset’ using:

########################################################
#import GSS2014 file in SPSS .sav format
#uses foreign package
########################################################
require(foreign)
Dataset <- read.spss("/path to your location/GSS2014.sav", 
                     use.value.labels=TRUE, max.value.labels=Inf, to.data.frame=TRUE)
########################################################

Once the GSS2014 file is loaded use the subset function to select your first subset of respondents who answered the 'abany' question with and 'YES response.  Use the following code to select the subset and store it in a data frame 'SS1':

####################################################
#select subset from Dataset and write to data frame SS1
####################################################
SS1 <- subset(Dataset, abany == "YES", select=educ)
View(SS1)
####################################################

Now select a second subset of respondents who answered the 'abany' question with a 'NO' response. Use the following code to select the subset and store in a data frame 'SS2':

######################################################
#select subset from Dataset and write to data frame SS2
######################################################
SS2 <- subset(Dataset, abany == "NO", select=educ)
View(SS2)
######################################################

In using the subset function as seen above the name of the data set is specified, the criteria for selecting rows is given, and the variables to select from each row specified.  If no 'select' option is given all variables will be shown for the selected row.

Using the View command to examine each subset shows the years of education for each of the 746 respondents who answered ‘YES’ and each of the 907 respondents who answered ‘NO.’ Since the variable ‘educ’ is measured as ratio level numeric data we can calculate a mean and standard deviation for each subset and perform both graphical and statistical analysis of any observed difference between the two means. This will be the subject of the next installment of the tutorial.

Tutorial: Using R to Analyze GSS2014 Social Science Data, Part One: Importing the Database in SPSS or STATA Format


For anyone interested in researching social science questions there is a wealth of survey data available through the National Opinion Research Center (NORC) and its associated research universities. The Center has been conducting a national survey each year since 1972 and has compiled a massive database of data from these surveys. Most if not all of these data files can be accessed and downloaded without charge. I have been working with the 2014 edition of the data and for this tutorial will use the GSS2014 data file that is available for download on the Center’s web site. ( See the NORC main website at http://www.norc.org/Research/Projects/Pages/general-social-survey.aspx and at http://www3.norc.org/GSS+Website ).

As noted above the datasets that are available for download are available in both SPSS format and STATA format. To work with either of these formats using R it is necessary to read the file into a data frame using one of a couple of different packages. The first option I will discuss uses the Hmisc package. The second option I will discuss uses the foreign package. Install both of these packages from your favorite CRAN mirror site before starting the code in this tutorial.

For this tutorial I am using the one year release file GSS2014. This file contains 2538 cases and 866 variables. Download the file   from the web site listed above in both SPSS and STATA formats. Use the following code to load the Hmisc package into your R global environment:

                >require(Hmisc)

Now load the GSS2014.sav SPSS version from your storage device using the following line of code. I am using the filename GSS2014 for my data file and loading the file into the data frame ‘gss14’:

>#load the GSS data file in SPSS format

                >put data into data frame ‘gss14’

                gss14 <- spss.get(F:/research/Documents/GSS2014.sav”,                     use.value.labels=TRUE)

                >

To view the data that was loaded use the command:

>View(gss14)

This will produce a spreadsheet-like matrix of rows and columns containing the data. To load the data file in STATA format download the STATA version of the file from the NORC web site a discussed above. My STATA file is also named GSS2014, but with the STATA .dta extension. Load the file into a data frame using:

>load STATA format file into data frame ‘Dataset2’

                >Datatset2 <- read.dta(“F:/resarch/Documents/GSS2014.dta”)

               >

Once again, you can view the data frame loaded using the command:

>View(dataset2)

Both the STATA and SPSS formats of the data set can also be loaded into R using the foreign package. The procedure is the same for both SPSS and STATA

>load SPSS version

                >require(foreign)

                >Dataset <- read.spss(“F:/research/Documents/GSS2014.sav”,   use.value.labels=TRUE)

 >load STATA version into data frame ‘Dataset3’

>Dataset3 <- read.dta(“E:/research/Documents/GSS2014.dta”)

Use the ‘View()’ command to view the data frame.

In part two I will discuss some techniques using R to create and analyze subsets of the GSS2014 data file.

 

Using R for Nonparametric Analysis, The Kruskal-Wallis Test Part Four: R Script and Some Notes on IDE’s


 

Using R for Nonparametric Analysis, The Kruskal-Wallis Test: R Script and Some Notes on IDE’s

 

A tutorial by Douglas M. Wiig

 

In the previous three parts of this tutorial I discussed using R to enter a data set and perform a nonparametric Kruska-Wallis test for ranked means. In this final part the commented script that was used in the first three parts is listed. 

 

If you are going to use R for the majority of your statistical analysis it is highly advisable that you investigate some of the IDE’s (Integrated Development Environments) that are available to assist in coding and debugging R script and creating R packages for personal use or distribution. I think one of the easiest to use is R Studio. R Studio is available in both free open source and commercial versions and can be downloaded at http://www.rstudio.com    There are versions available for Windows, various Linux distributions, and Mac OS.

The R studio console provides a number of useful tools that facilitate coding. The screen is divided into four sections with one section providing a code editor that features syntax highlighting, code completion and many other features such as line or block code execution. Another window contains R and all displays output, error messages and warnings when code is executed from the editor. A third window displays all of the current environmental variables that are active and can also show all currently loaded R packages. A fourth window can show graphic output from executed code, can be used to manage, download and install R packages, and can be used to access the CRAN database of online help. There are other useful tools that are too numerous to discuss here.

 

Another program that is worth looking at is RKWard which combines an IDE with a graphics GUI for R statistical analysis. Information and downloads for RKWard can be found at https://rkward.kde.org. This program is also free and open source and can be run on a Windows platform, Mac OS, or various distributions of Linux. The program has been optimized for Linux. A discussion of these IDE’s is beyond the scope of this posting.

 

Shown below is the commented R script for all three parts of the Kruskal-Wallis tutorial. For ease of reading code portions are shown in bold print.

 

#packages that must be present in the global environment before running these scripts

 

#stats; graphics; grDevices; utils; datasets; methods; base

 

#

 

#code to enter data using the data editor

 

#KW data entry, define file kruskal as a data frame

 

kruskal <-data.frame()

 

#invoke the data editor

 

kruskal <-edit(kruskal)

 

#define group as containing 3 factors; tell R which data column goes with which factor

 

group <- factor(1,2,3)

 

#alternative data entry method

 

#Define factor Group as containing three categories

 

Group <- c(1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3)

 

#create a vector defined as authscore and enter values

 

authscore <- c(96,128,83,61,101,82,121,132,135,109,115,149,166,147)

 

#create data frame kruskal matching each group factor to individual scores

 

kruskal <- data.frame(Group, authscore)

 

#use the following line to look at the structure of the data frame created

 

str(kruskal)

 

#run the basic Kruskal-Wallis test

 

#

 

kruskal.test(authscore ~ Group, data=kruskal)

 

#

 

#the following code is used to conduct a post-hoc comparison of the ranked means

 

#it is useful to first do a simple boxplot for a visual comparison

 

#Use this script to save the boxplot graphic to a .png data file

 

#save output in pdf file authplot

 

#send output to screen and file

 

sink()

 

authplot <- boxplot(authscore ~ Group, data=kruskal, main=”Group Comparison”, ylab=”authscore”)

 

#save .png file

 

png(“authplot.png”)

 

#now return all output to console

 

dev.off()

 

#

 

#make sure that the package PMCMR is loaded before running the following script

 

library(PMCMR)

 

#use the ‘with’ function to pass the data from the kruskal data frame to the post hoc

 

#test script; specify the Tukey HSD method for determining significance of each

 

# pair of comparisions

 

#

 

with(kruskal, {

 

 

posthoc.kruskal.nemenyi.test(authscore, Group, “Tukey”)

 

})

 

#

 

#NOTE: if using a version of R < 3.xx then use the package pgirmess instead of PMCMR

 

#

 

#the following lines show the post hoc analysis using the pgirmess package

 

#note the function kuskalmc is used for the comparisons

 

library(pgirmess)

 

authscore <- c(96,128,83,61,101,82,121,132,135,109,115,149,166,147)

 

Group <- c(1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3)

 

kruskalmc(authscore ~ Group, probs=.05, cont=NULL)

 

#

 

Using R in Nonparametric Statistical Analysis, The Kruskal-Wallis Test Part Three: Post Hoc Pairwise Multiple Comparison Analysis of Ranked Means


Using the Kruskal-Wallis Test, Part Three:  Post Hoc Pairwise Multiple Comparison Analysis of Ranked Means

A tutorial by Douglas M. Wiig

In previous tutorials I discussed an example of entering data into a data frame and performing a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test to determine if there were differences in the authoritarian scores of three different groups of educators. The test statistic indicated that at least one of the groups(group 1) was significantly different from the other two.

In order to explore the difference further it common practice to do post hoc analysis of the differences. There are a number of methods that have been devised to do these comparisons, but one of the most straightforward and easiest to understand is pairwise comparison of ranked means(or means if using standard ANOVA.)

Prior to entering the code for this section be sure that the following packages are installed and loaded:

       PMCMR

   prirmess

In part one data was entered into the R editor to create a data frame. Data frames can also be created directly using R script. The script to create the data frame for this example uses the following code:

#create data frame from script input

>Group <- c(1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3)

>authscore <-c(96,128,83,61,101,82,121,132,135,109,115,149,166,147)

>kruskal <- data.frame(Group, authscore)

The group identifiers are entered and assigned to the variable Group, and the authority scores are assigned to the variable authscore. Notice that each identifier is matched with an appropriate authscore just as they were when entered in columns using the data editor. The vectors are then assigned to the variable kruskal to create a data.frame. Once again the structure of the data frame can be checked using the command:

>str(kruskal)

resulting in:

'data.frame':   14 obs. of  2 variables:
 $ Group    : num  1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 ...
 $ authscore: num  96 128 83 61 101 82 121 132 135 109 ...

>

It is often useful to do a visual examination of the ranked means prior to post hoc analysis. This can be easily accomplished using a boxplot to display the 3 groups that are presented in the example. If the data frame created in tutorial one is still in the global environment the boxplot can be generated with the following script:

>#boxplot using authscore and group variables from the data frame created in part one

>boxplot(authscore ~ group, data=kruskal, main=”Group Comparison”, ylab=”authscore”)

>

The resulting boxplot is seen below:

Rplot5

As can be seen in the plot, authority score differences are the greatest between group 1 and 3 with group 2 In between. Use the following code to run the Kruskal-Wallis test and examine if any of the means are significantly different:

#library(PMCMR)

with(kruskal, {

posthoc.kruskal.nemenyi.test(authscore, Group, “Tukey”)

}

The post hoc test used in this example is from the recently released PMCMR R package. For details of this and other post hoc tests contained in the package( see Thorsten Polert, Calculate Pairwise Multiple Comparisons of Mean Rank Sums, 2015. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/PMCMR/PMCMR.pdf.) The test employed here used the Tukey method to make pairwise comparisons of the mean rank authoritarianism scores of the three groups. The output from the script above is:

Pairwise comparisons using Tukey and Kramer (Nemenyi) test

with Tukey-Dist approximation for independent samples

data: authscore and Group

      1                    2

2   0.493             –

3    0.031        0.310

P value adjustment method: none

The output above confirms what would be expected from observing the boxplot. The only means that differ significantly are means 1 and 3 with a p = .031.

The PMCMR package will only work with R versions 3.0.x. If using an earlier version of R another package can be used to accomplish the post hoc comparisons. This package is the pgirmess package (see http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pgirmess/pgirmess.pdf for complete details). Using the vectors authscore and Group that were created earlier the script for multiple comparison using the pgirmess package is:

library(pgirmess)

authscore <- c(96,128,83,61,101,82,121,132,135,109,115,149,166,147)

Group <- c(1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3)

kruskalmc(authscore ~ Group, probs=.05, cont=NULL)

and the output from this script using a significance level of p = .05 is:

Multiple comparison test after Kruskal-Wallis

p.value: 0.05

Comparisons

      obs.dif    critical.dif     difference

1-2    3.0        6.333875         FALSE

1-3    7.1        6.718089         TRUE

2-3    4.1        6.718089        FALSE

>

As noted earlier the comparison between groups one and three is shown to be the only significant difference at the p=.05 level.

Both the PMCMR and the pgirmess packages are useful in producing post hoc comparisons with the Kruskal-Wallis test. It hoped that the series of tutorials discussing nonparametric alternatives common parametric statistical tests has helped demonstrate the utility of these approaches in statistical analysis.

In part four I will post the complete script used in all three tutorials.

Using R for Nonparametric Statistics: The Kruskal-Wallis Test, Part Two


Using R for Nonparametric Statistics:  The Kruskal-Wallis Test, Part Two

A Tutorial by Douglas M. Wiig

Before we can run the Kruskal-Wallis test we need to define which column contains the factors (independent variables) and which contains the authoritarianism scores (dependent variable). Once we define the factor column R will match the correct score to each of the 14 observations.
As set up in the study, ‘Group’ is the factor(independent variable), and ‘authscore’ is the dependent variable. Use the command:

> Group <-factor(1,2,3)

This designates which observation belongs to each group. To make sure the data structure has been set up correctly use the command:

> str(kruskal)
‘data.frame’: 14 obs. of 2 variables:
$ Group : num 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 …
$ authscore: num 96 128 83 61 101 82 124 132 135 109 …
>

The output of this command shows a summary of the structure of the data frame created. We can now run the Kruskal Wallis test with the command:

> kruskal.test(authscore ~ Group, data=kruskal)

The output will be:

Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test

data: authscore by Group
Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 6.4057, df = 2, p-value = 0.04065

>

As seen in the above output the analysis of authoritarianism score by group indicates that the probability of differences in scores among the three groups being due to chance alone is less that the .05 alpha level that was set for the study. (pobt < .05). Further post hoc analysis would be necessary to determine the exact nature of the differences among the scores of the three groups. This will be the topic of a future tutorial.

More to come:  Part Three will explore the use of multiple comparison techniques to analyze ranked means

R Tutorial: A Simple Script to Create and Analyze a Data File, Part Two


A simple R script to create and analyze a data file:part two:    A tutorial by D.M. Wiig

In part one I discussed creating a simple data file containing the height and weight of 10 subjects.  In part two I will discuss the script needed to create a simple scatter diagram of the data and perform a basic Pearson correlation.  Before attempting to continue the script in this tutorial make sure that you have created and save the data file as discussed in part one.

To conduct a correlation/regression analysis of the data we want to first view a simple scatter plot. Load a library named ‘car’ into R memory. Use the command:

> library(car)

Then issue the following command to plot the graph:

> plot(Height~Weight, log=”xy”, data=Sampledatafile)

The output is seen below:

scatter1

We can calculate a Pearson’s Product Moment correlation coefficient by using the command:

> # Pearson rank-order correlations between height and weight

> cor(Sampledatafile[,c(“Height”,”Weight”)], use=”complete.obs”, method=”pearson”)

Which results in:

Height Weight

Height 1.0000000 0.8813799

Weight 0.8813799 1.0000000

To run a simple linear regression for Height and Weight use the following code. Note that the dependent variable (Weight) is listed firt:

> model <-lm(Weight~Height, data=Sampledatafile)

> summary(model)

Call:

lm(formula = Weight ~ Height, data = Sampledatafile)

Residuals:

Min 1Q Median 3Q Max

-30.6800 -16.9749 -0.8774 19.9982 25.3200

Coefficients:

Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)

(Intercept) -337.986 98.403 -3.435 0.008893 **

Height 7.518 1.425 5.277 0.000749 ***

Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

Residual standard error: 21.93 on 8 degrees of freedom

Multiple R-squared: 0.7768, Adjusted R-squared: 0.7489

F-statistic: 27.85 on 1 and 8 DF, p-value: 0.0007489

>

To plot a regression line on the scatter diagram use the following command line. Note that we enter the y (dependent)variable first and then the x (independent)variable:

> scatterplot(Weight~Height, log=”xy”, reg.line=lm, smooth=FALSE, spread=FALSE,

+ data=Sampledatafile)

>

This will produce a graph as seen below. Note that box plots have also been included in the output:

scatter2

This tutorial has hopefully demonstrated that complex tasks can be accomplished with relatively simple command line script. I will explore more of these simple scripts in future tutorials.

More to Come:

 

R Tutorial: A Script to Create and Analyze a Simple Data File, Part One


R Tutorial: A Simple Script to Create and Analyze a Data File, Part One

By D.M. Wiig

In this tutorial I will walk you through a simple script that will show you how to create a data file and perform some simple statistical procedures on the file. I will break the code into segments and discuss what each segment does. Before starting this tutorial make sure you have a terminal window open and open R from the command line.

The first task is to create a simple data file. Let’s assume that we have some data from 10 individuals measuring each person’s height and weight. The data is shown below:

Height(inches) Weight(lbs)

72               225

60               128

65               176

75               215

66               145

65               120

70               210

71               176

68               155

77               250

We can enter the data into a data matrix by invoking the data editor and entering the values. Please note that the lines of code preceded by a # are comments and are ignored by R:

#Create a new file and invoke the data editor to enter data

#Create the file Sampledatafile, height and weight of 10 s subjects

Sampledatafile <-data.frame()

Sampledatafile <-edit(Sampledatafile)

You will see a window open that is the R Data Editor. Click on the column heading ‘var1’ and you will see several different data types in the drop down menu. Choose the ‘real’ data type. Follow the same procedure to set the data type for the second column. Enter the data pairs in the columns, with height in the first column and weight in the second column. When the data have been entered click on the var1 heading for column 1 and click ‘Change Name.’ Enter ‘Height’ to label the first column. Follow the same steps to rename the second column ‘Weight.’

Once both columns of data have been entered you can click ‘Quit.’ The datafile ‘Sampledatafile’ is now loaded into memory.

To run so me basic descriptive statistics use the following code:

> #Run descriptives on the data

> summary(Sampledatafile)

The output from this code will be:

  Height                Weight

Min. :60.00          Min. :120.0

1st Qu.:65.25        1st Qu.:147.5

Median :69.00        Median :176.0

Mean :68.90          Mean :180.0

3rd Qu.:71.75        3rd Qu.:213.8

Max. :77.00          Max. :250.0

>

To view the data file use the following lines of code:

>#print the datafile ‘Sampledatafile’ on the screen

> print(Sampledatafile)

You will see the output:

Height          Weight

1 72             225

2 60             128

3 65             176

4 75             215

5 66             145

6 65             120

7 70             210

8 71             176

9 68             155

10 77            250

In Part Two I will discuss an R script to do a simple correlation and scatter diagram.  Check back later!